Mad scientist’s NFTs degrade when they’re traded: 0xDEAFBEEF, NFT Creator

31 May 2023

Cointelegraph By Greg Oakford

When NFTs first took off, it was Beeple’s digital art, CryptoPunks and Bored Ape Yacht Club PFPs that dominated the headlines and top sales — but one individual bucked the trend in a unique way, garnering attention with generative audiovisual art using just a C compiler.

That individual was 0xDEAFBEEF, an artist and engineer based in Toronto, Canada who’s spent over 20 years experimenting with art, technology, music, generative art, computer animation, blacksmithing and sound recording.

Using low-level computer code and a minimal toolset to craft raw information into audiovisual artworks has proven more popular than you might expect. A collection of six of 0xDEAFBEEF’s sold for $6.8 million in August 2021, and two weeks ago, “Series 1: Angular – Token 134” fetched $241,300 at Sotheby’s. It was auctioned during part 1 of “Grails,” a collection of highly desirable NFTs originally owned by the now-insolvent 3AC (Three Arrows Capital).

Trained on classic piano as a kid and somewhat of a mad scientist when it came to audio equipment, discovering a programmable blockchain in Ethereum was a revelation.

“I’d describe myself as a tinkerer, jumping around between many fields, overlapping art and technology. It just happened that the project that I commenced before I knew anything about NFTs, doing audiovisual work with code, happened to align with things that were happening within Ethereum,” 0xDEAFBEEF says.

“It was great timing. When I look back, had I missed that window in 2021 by three to six months, things might have looked much different.”

But like so many successful NFT artists that have emerged in the explosion of the new digital art era, “not planned” is a common theme.

In March 2021, his “Synth Poems” were born, inspired by the sound of analog synthesizers. These short generative music pieces are stored fully on-chain.

NFTs that degrade in quality

NFTs have been a playground for experimentation, and 0xDEAFBEEF’s work “Entropy” is unique in that the tokens degrade in quality each time they are traded.

“Entropy is thematically about permanence, and permanence is a theme of on-chain generative art. It’s a theme of crypto in general with things being permanent and immutable,” says 0xDEAFBEEF.

“It was interesting to me. There’s a narrative of on-chain art being more permanent than other NFTs where the files are stored on another server and have the potential to disappear. But I asked myself the question of how immutable it is through ‘Entropy.'”

“Using the ‘Entropy’ artwork to paradoxically critique the idea of permanence by having this digital artwork that changes and degrades every time it changes ownership — I thought it was interesting thematically.”

Since the recent introduction of the Blur marketplace, many NFT collections, particularly PFP projects, have seen the emphasis on aesthetics decline with most sales being anchored to current floor prices. It’s also posed the question of does the number of times an NFT gets passed around between owners matter?

For some collectors, it actually does. While a digital piece of art or collectible doesn’t face the same wear and tear challenges a physical item does, the history of ownership could be a factor, with some collectors putting a premium on those that haven’t been passed around like a hot potato.

Read also


Features

Soulbound Tokens: Social credit system or spark for global adoption?


Features

Airdrops: Building communities or building problems?

“Entropy” was an experiment ahead of its time. “People can have their own interpretation, but I don’t think it was necessarily a means to really discourage people from trading the NFT or transferring the NFT,” he says.

“Is it more valuable if it’s been transferred or not? It’s up to the collectors to decide, but it does add this narrative. It wasn’t really a way to stick it to people that are buying and selling works — that’s obviously part of the culture. Tradability and collectibility is a very interesting dimension of NFTs. It’s really just an artwork that touches on all of those themes and at least asks you to consider it.”

Personal style:

Many NFT collectors believe it’s harder for digital artists that focus on audio to cut through as effectively as visual artists as audio takes longer to consume.

0xDEAFBEEF has been able to cut through this friction with his own distinct monochrome visual style that is a great hook to unlock the audio aspect of the art.

“People see it first before they hear it usually because of the dominance of social media — it’s all visually oriented. The monochrome aesthetic of my work is something that comes through a lot. There’s a bunch of reasons why I work in monochrome. One of them is just being practical because this was originally a sound-based project,” he says.

“I was focused on audio synthesis, and I was focused on motion and animation. Bringing those two things together is already many dimensions, so working with sound and with motion that might introduce color is too much. Monochrome has sort of become part of the style for those reasons.”

DEAFBEEF Full Set (6 items) — Sold for 2,275 ETH ($6.8 million on the date of sale) on Aug. 19, 2021.

(The buyer was later revealed as Brevan Howard founder Alan Howard.)

“Glitchbox” from the set of 6. (OpenSea)“Angular” from the set of 6. (OpenSea)Transmission” from the set of 6. (OpenSea)

Advection” (below) was sold for $307,157 on June 29, 2022.

Influences:

0xDEAFBEEF cites American musician Frank Zappa as someone who was very influential early on in the way he thinks about music and art.

“It’s about his music but also the spirit and ethos of it — sort of sticking to your guns and doing things for yourself. Another way I think about it is making things that aren’t necessarily for the crowd,” he said.

“If it wasn’t for that encounter, I might have just kept on doing my engineering degree and wound up in a boring job and being regretful about things. It helped me give myself permission to do something more risky.”

“I don’t listen to Frank as much as I used to now. Looking back, he does have some problematic kinds of themes and things. I don’t idolize him or anything, but he was still quite influential on me as a young person.”

Read also


Features

Shanghai Special: Crypto crackdown fallout and what happens next


Features

The Metaverse is awful today… but we can make it great: Yat Siu, Big Ideas

Which hot NFT artists should we be paying attention to?

Operator — Experiential duo of Ania Catherine and Dejha Ti.

“They have a long-standing art practice, but more recently, I think they’re working with generative choreography. I think that’s really fascinating. They’re coming at it from a very strong technical and conceptual aesthetic.”

Trevor Paglan — Satellites, deep-time, seeing machines, infrastructure

“Trevor is an artist that investigates. He has a recent ‘Art Blocks’ drop that ties in with other projects that he’s doing that are related to security and privacy, which I think are really relevant at this time.”

Paul Pfeiffer — Video artist

“Paul is an amazing video artist. He’s well known and doing his first NFT with Art World. It looks really phenomenal.”

Holly Herndon — Artist working with voice models and artists’ rights

“Holly has been studying at Stanford about artists’ rights for a while. She’s known what was coming for many years now. She’s been working with voice models. It’s fascinating stuff.”

Notable collectors:

The qualified electrical engineer genius of 0xDEAFBEEF is collected by many notable NFT whale collectors, but it’s other artists in particular who he pointed out make him smile knowing they appreciate his work.

“I’m extremely appreciative of all my collectors and anyone that’s taken an interest in my work. The most meaningful ones that have honestly made me smile have been art-for-art trades with other artists.”

“I traded a ‘Glitch Box‘ with Snowfro for several unminted ‘Chromie Squiggles.’ I’m really proud to have that in his collection, and also to receive those Squiggles is super meaningful.”

“I also traded ‘Synth Poem’ with Mitchell F Chan, who is a conceptual artist that’s been working with blockchain stuff. He has a project from 2017 that’s really relevant called ‘Digital Zones of Immaterial Pictorial Sensibility.'”

“Then there’s Jack Rockland, who has held one of my ‘Synth Poems’ all the way through since March 2021. He works at ArtBlocks and is an artist himself. I’m really proud to have him as a long-time collector.”

Favorite NFTs in your wallet that aren’t your own:

Stipple Sunsets” by Jack Rockland.

“It was the first NFT that I minted that wasn’t my own; plus, it was the work of a friend, so it makes it really meaningful for me.”

Links:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/_deafbeef

Website: https://www.deafbeef.com/

0xDEAFBEEFNFTNFT Creator

Read also

  

You might also like

Ripple says latest ruling does not affect its legal victory  
Ripple says latest ruling does not affect its legal victory  

Ripple’s legal chief said a US court’s rejection of a proposed XRP settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) does not pose a threat to Ripple’s win.Judge Analisa Torres of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected a joint Ripple-SEC motion seeking an indicative ruling on their proposed settlement, according to a filing on May 15.Ripple’s chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, said the rejection does not reverse the company’s victory in the case. The company announced the end of the lawsuit on March 19.Source: Stuart AlderotyAlderoty stressed that the latest court decision does not change the fact that XRP (XRP) is not a security, adding that the rejection is related to “procedural concerns with the dismissal of Ripple’s cross-appeal.”Why did the court refuse to grant the ruling?According to the court document, Torres denied the motion as “procedurally improper” since the SEC and Ripple failed to file the correct procedural motion to support the proposed settlement.“By styling their motion as one for ‘settlement approval,’ the parties fail to address the heavy burden they must overcome to vacate the injunction and substantially reduce the civil penalty,” the Judge wrote.An excerpt from the court’s rejection of the SEC-Ripple motion on May 15, 2025. Source: CourtlistenerThe SEC and Ripple agreed to lower the court’s $125 million fine days before Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse announced the end of the case. Subsequently, Alderoty disclosed on X that the SEC will keep $50 million of the $125 million fine.“The parties have made no effort to satisfy that burden here; their request does not even mention the Rule,” the court document stated.Community asks for explanationAs Alderoty has not provided any details on the nature of procedural concerns by the court, but assured the public that Ripple and the SEC are “fully in agreement to resolve the case,” many in the community were unhappy with the lack of specifics from Ripple.“First, in a recent post about this case, you said you would not be making any more X posts because the case was closed,” one XRP observer responded to Alderoty in the X thread.Source: X thread from Stuart Alderoty“Second, I don’t think it’s enough to just say that it’s procedural. I think further explanation of what went wrong in the filing is needed,” one XRP observer wrote in an X thread,” the post continued.Related: Ripple commits $25M to US school nonprofits“Let’s remember that both he and Brad said the case was over, and it still isn’t; they’re cheating us a little,” another user speculated.The news came shortly after online reports suggested that US President Donald Trump was allegedly manipulated by a Ripple-linked lobbyist into announcing the XRP token would be part of his plans for a national cryptocurrency reserve.Many in the Bitcoin (BTC) community have been slamming Ripple for advocating for a multi-coin strategic reserve, instead of a Bitcoin-only reserve.Magazine: Danger signs for Bitcoin as retail abandons it to institutions: Sky Wee

Europe’s MiCA law is motion, but can the crypto industry keep up?  
Europe’s MiCA law is motion, but can the crypto industry keep up?  

The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation — better known as MiCA — is now in its critical implementation phase. Designed to unify crypto regulation across all 27 EU member states, MiCA promises clarity, consumer protection and long-term market stability. But as implementation begins, cracks are already showing.In this week’s episode of Byte-Sized Insight, we explore the key provisions of MiCA now in force, particularly around stablecoins, and why some of the largest players in the market are refusing to comply.As of January 2025, crypto asset service providers (CASPs) began acquiring licenses to operate legally within the EU. A transitional or “grandfathering” period allows existing firms up to 18 months, depending on the member state, to comply. Still, with deadlines approaching, firms are being forced to act quickly.Stablecoins at bayOne of MiCA’s earliest and most controversial provisions involves stablecoins. Under the law, no stablecoin can be offered to EU users unless the issuer is authorized in the EU and publishes a regulator-approved white paper.Strict rules around asset reserves, governance, conflict of interest and marketing are also part of the package. Issuers are even banned from offering interest on tokens, removing a common incentive for adoption.Related: Stablecoin regulation next ‘catalyst’ for crypto industry — Aptos headThe world’s most-used stablecoin — Tether’s USDt (USDT) — has already announced it won’t seek MiCA compliance, meaning exchanges may soon be forced to delist it across the EU. This has major implications for liquidity, retail access and DeFi activity in the region.Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino told Cointelegraph’s Gareth Jenkinson at Token 2049:“The reason is not, uh, fear of regulations, fear of compliance… The problem that I had with um, with MiCA is that [the] license is very dangerous when it comes to stablecoins and I believe that it’s even more dangerous for the small medium banking system in Europe.”Compliance is keyOn the flip side, other firms are leaning in. BitGo, a crypto custody firm, recently secured a MiCA-aligned license in Germany, positioning itself to serve institutional players across Europe. Brett Reeves, head of Go Network and European Sales at BitGo, told Cointelegraph the license is not just about compliance, but long-term strategic alignment with Europe’s evolving regulatory landscape.“We found that both BaFin and the European regulators have been relatively straightforward to deal with. Sometimes they have difficult questions, but they’re there to make sure that our processes are in place and up to scratch.”We also spoke with Erwin Voloder, head of policy at the European Blockchain Association, who emphasized the need for consistent national-level interpretation and better guidance from regulators to prevent fragmentation.Listen to the full episode of Byte-Sized Insight for the complete interview on Cointelegraph’s Podcasts page, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And don’t forget to check out Cointelegraph’s full lineup of other shows! Magazine: Legal Panel: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in stablecoin fight

Fake Eric Trump-themed token is ‘rug in the making,’ says Bubblemaps  
Fake Eric Trump-themed token is ‘rug in the making,’ says Bubblemaps  

A fake Eric Trump-themed memecoin launched on Solana’s memecoin launchpad Pump.fun, rose more than 6,200% in the past 24 hours, raising red flags among blockchain analysts who warned of a potential rug pull.A newly-created Eric Trump (ERICTRUMP) memecoin with the token address “jv7d” surpassed $140 million in market capitalization within a day since its launch on May 16, CoinMarketCap data shows.ERICTRUMP/USD, all-time chart. Source: CoinMarketCap The memecoin’s distribution raises significant red flags that point to a rug pull “in the making,” warned blockchain data platform Bubblemaps in a May 16 X post.Source: BubblemapsA rug pull typically refers to the sudden removal of liquidity or mass sell-off by token insiders, often resulting in a steep price collapse that leaves retail holders with worthless tokens. Looking at Bubblemaps’ token clusters for the 250 largest holders, the majority of these tokens are held across 10 token clusters, founded by 10 main crypto addresses.Related: Coinbase faces $400M bill after insider phishing attackThe token’s ownership pattern is reminiscent of recent memecoin collapses, including the Wolf of Wall Street-inspired WOLF token, created by Hayden Davis, the co-creator of the Official Melania Meme (MELANIA) and the Libra token.Source: BubblemapsOver 82% of the WOLF token’s supply was held by the same entity, which led to a 99% price crash after the token peaked at a $42 million market capitalization.Related: Ukraine strategic Bitcoin reserve bill reportedly in final stagesEric Trump token deployer created four scam tokensThe deployer behind the fake Eric Trump token also created three other Eric Trump tokens that failed on Pump.fun,” a Bubblemaps investigator told Cointelegraph.Fake Eric Trump tokens created by the same deployer: Source: Solscan, BubblemapsBlockchain data shared by the firm shows that these tokens were all created around the same time by the Solana blockchain address “BjTm.”Industry watchers have been increasingly vigilant about rug pulls since the meltdown of the Libra (LIBRA) token, endorsed by Argentine President Javier Milei, which saw eight insider wallets cash out $107 million in liquidity, leading to a $4 billion market cap wipeout within hours.Magazine: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in stablecoin fight

Open chat
1
BlockFo Chat
Hello 👋, How can we help you?
📱 When you've pressed the BlockFo button, we automatically transfer to WhatsApp 🔝🔐
🖥️ Or, if you use a PC or Mac, then we'll open a new window to load your desktop app.